Writing the Introduction The introduction should include the following: The title of the play, the name of the playwright, and any pertinent historical information regarding them other similar works from this period? The name of the director, the place and date of the production you attended, and the name of the production company again, do you know of any previous work by this company? The thesis of your review, which should include possibly in more than a single statement the following:
Writing the Introduction The introduction should include the following: The title of the play, the name of the playwright, and any pertinent historical information regarding them other similar works from this period?
The name of the director, the place and date of the production you attended, and the name of the production company again, do you know of any previous work by this company?
The thesis of your review, which should include possibly in more than a single statement the following: A general impression of the relative success or failure of the production, based on what you actually saw and on your initial impression of how the play should have been performed.
Note that even if the production did not exactly coincide with your own conception of the play, you should not feel obliged to condemn the performance outright. Be open-minded and willing to weigh pros and cons.
Note that this thesis asserts that Papp captured the essence of what is in the text itself -- the expectations set up by the thesis are that the reviewer will then analyze the methods by which the director achieved this effect.
Without that sympathy, the play would have been reduced to pure chaos and would have failed to portray an American ideal of freedom. Since you will not be expected to discuss all aspects of the production, focus your thesis on one or two major concerns that the performance has or has not addressed.
Read your assignment carefully to find out which aspects of the performance are to be emphasized in your review. You can include this summary in the introduction; or, if you wish to expand the summary, include it in a separate paragraph following the introduction.
Writing the Body of the Paper: The Review Remember that in the body of the paper you are obliged to deal specifically with each element of the production that you mentioned in the introduction and thesis.
In order to give your review a tight internal logic and cohesiveness, you should also discuss these elements in the order that you outlined in the introduction. For each element that you discuss: In as brief and precise a manner as possible, describe in detail the physical aspects of what you saw performed.
Keep in mind at all times that whatever you include must in some way contribute to the assertion you made in your introduction and thesis.
Focus on particular scenes or performances that will provide the evidence for your final evaluation of the play. The tempest scene in Lear utilized a particularly hostile set in order to universalize the suffering depicted throughout the play. The lights were dimmed and the backdrop was flat black.
Against this backdrop were propped, in no particular order, seven skulls that looked out over the events to come. Note the vivid description of what was seen, and the use of detail to convey that vividness. The passage will work nicely as evidence for an overall, positive evaluation of the production.
This part of the paper requires the most thought and organization and consequently receives the most attention from your reader.
After you have finished describing important elements of the production, proceed to evaluate them. For example, you would need to answer the following questions regarding the last description of Lear:Oct 05, · Learning how to write a character analysis requires a thorough reading of the literary work with attention to what the author reveals about the character through dialogue, narrative, and plot.
A literary analyst writes about the role each character plays in the work%(14). Essay on Sophocles' Clever Use of Dramatic Irony in Oedipus the King Words 4 Pages Dramatic irony depends on the audience’s knowing something that the character does not, and in this play the audience knows Oedipus faith before he knows it himself.
The fact that this is a play makes it by definition a drama, a piece of literature meant to be spoken by actors in front of a live audience.
This particular drama focuses on the trials and tribulat. The particular blend of character traits that enable Iago’s manipulation of Othello Although the play is named Othello, and although this character’s position and deeds are the center of the story, it is the character of Iago that expedites the action within the play.
Molière humanizes Tartuffe by endowing him with one other flaw. His eventual downfall is caused by his lust.
Instead of making Tartuffe into an inhuman monster, Molière shows how lust causes the clever hypocrite to lower his mask and reveal his hypocrisy. Elements of Analysis: Type of Play Analyzing a play simply means that you are questioning the text in order to gain a better understanding of the author's message, style, or even characters.
Typically, you are analyzing the script for the theme through its development of dramatic techniques.